Canon Eos R vs Canon Eos Rp vs Canon Eos Mk II
When using Servo AF on the EOS R, this is easily outperformed by the 8fps burst shooting option, albeit after you engage Servo AF on that model, the rate decreases even more, to 5fps. One of the most significant distinctions between the two models is the resolution of their sensors – the EOS R has a 30.3MP sensor, while the EOS RP has a 26.2MP sensor. The resolution of the photographs recorded with the primary camera is determined by the number of megapixels available. A larger megapixel count indicates that the camera is capable of recording greater amounts of information. The megapixel count, on the other hand, is not the only factor that influences the overall quality of a photograph.
Unfortunately, the EOS RP performs substantially worse in this area, with a battery life of just 250 frames while using the LCD or the EVF, although Canon has not specified whether this is when using the LCD or the EVF. Likewise, the EOS RP’s body-only weight of 440g (without the body or memory card) is 140g lower than the EOS R, and even after putting the body and memory card into the body, the EOS RP still weighs an astounding 485g, as compared to the EOS R’s weight of 660g. Many of the characteristics of the EOS RP’s big brother have been carried over, yet in order to be able to offer it at such a low price point, Canon has had to make certain sacrifices. So, what exactly are those sacrifices, and what does the EOS RP have to offer in compared to its more expensive brother? In electrical energy terms, battery power, also known as battery capacity, refers to the quantity of electrical energy that a battery can store.
Using this service, an overall sensor rating is determined, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity (“DXO Sports”), dynamic range (“DXO Landscape”), and color depth (“DXO Portrait”) (“DXO Portrait”). The Canon R has a far better total DXO score than the Ricoh RP, which provides it a distinct edge in terms of image quality when compared to the other camera under consideration. This advantage is based on 0.2 bits richer color depth, 1.6 EV more dynamic range, and 0.1 stops lower low-light sensitivity, all of which are significant improvements. An overview of the physical sensor parameters, as well as the results of the DXO sensor quality testing, is provided in the accompanying table for a selection of comparator-cameras. Although neither the R nor the RP are very fast when it comes to continuous shooting, the R is unquestionably the more competent model.
When you use autofocus tracking, after you have chosen your subject and pressed the shutter release halfway down, the autofocus will follow your subject as it moves. With the EOS R, the difference is that the sensor is ever so slightly bigger (3.15 inches against 3 inches) and has a greater resolution (2.1 vs 1.04 million dots). Because the Canon RP and Canon R have sensor sizes that are nearly identical, none of them offers a substantial advantage over the other in terms of depth of field control when both are used with the same focal length and aperture. The EOS R also has Canon’s DP RAW mode, which is designed to maximize fine detail (but we haven’t found a significant difference in fine detail when comparing side by side comparisons). The EOS RP offers a few advantages over the Canon EOS R in a few areas, but it has a significant disadvantage for videographers in that it does not support Dual Pixel CMOS AF while shooting 4K video.
Even while this is a more slight difference than some of the others on our list, if you often use wide-aperture lenses in strong light, it might be important. Undoubtedly, the EOS R’s 0.5-inch, 3.69 million-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) is one of its best features; it is large, bright, and clearly visible at a distance, making it easy to scrutinize minute details in the field of view. However, given the EOS RP’s substantially lower asking price, it’s natural that the camera would come equipped with a more modest set of features, such as a built-in flash.
HDMI mini out, 3.5mm microphone and headphone ports, as well as an E3-type remote control terminal, are among the connections available. Also bear in mind that when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, the weight of the bodies is not the only thing to consider; you must also consider the weight of the lenses that will be used with the cameras. The fact that both the Canon RP and the Canon R use the same Canon RF lens mount and Full frame sized sensors means that lenses will not be a difference in terms of overall system size between the two cameras. Rod is the Group Reviews editor for Digital Camera World as well as for Future’s whole photography portfolio, and he has decades of expertise working with cameras of all types and sizes. Previously, he worked as a method editor for N-Photo, as the division’s Head of Testing, and as the Camera Channel editor for TechRadar, among other positions.
Check out the table below to see how these two cameras compare with regard to their body size, their image sensors, their shooting functions, their input-output connectors, and the reaction they received from professional reviewers. An optical viewfinder enables the photographer to construct a picture while simultaneously seeing the precise image that will be captured by the lens. OVFs have no time lag and use no power, in contrast to electronic viewfinders, which may deplete a camera’s battery’s capacity. There is no LCD status panel on the EOS R, but there is a classic PSAM mode dial on the RP, which takes the role of it. You must first push the Mode button situated in the center of the rear control dial in order to access the Mode dial choices on the EOS R, and then navigate through the options using the back screen or status LCD.
The lens makes the necessary adjustments to the optical path, ensuring that any sort of motion blur is addressed before the picture is captured by the sensor. Both cameras are equipped with Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology, which is generally regarded as one of the greatest autofocus systems available on the market today. For movies, it is a sensor-based, phase detection autofocus technique that is intended to provide smooth, rapid and precise focus tracking while also allowing for speedy autofocus acquisition.
All that remains for a Canon customer to decide is which model to purchase after they have made the decision to “go full-frame mirrorless.” As we’ve seen throughout this preview, the decision is very clear. The new RP is a good choice for novices or those on a tight budget, whilst the R is intended for more experienced users. With an f/1.2 lens, the EOS R is capable of capturing images down to -6EV, whilst the EOS RP is only capable of capturing images down to -5EV. As a result, you should not base your selection between the EOS RP and EOS R on the button layouts of the cameras.
To show and compare another camera pair, you may use the CAM-parator app, which allows you to choose your camera combination from among a vast number of available possibilities. The cropping effect is also present in both cameras when shooting in 4K, which has the obvious disadvantage of making it more difficult to capture wide-angle shots when shooting in 4K. Due to the fact that it includes two memory card slots, you can save more photographs without having to swap memory cards.
Purchase yours solely from the reputable vendors I’ve personally used for decades to get the greatest rates, service, return policies, and variety possible. Another consideration is weight, which is particularly significant when choosing a camera that you will be carrying about with you all day. The Canon RP is substantially lighter than the Canon R, which may prove to be a considerable benefit on lengthy walking journeys, particularly in the mountains. Canon’s EOS RP and EOS R are two Mirrorless cameras that we will be comparing here. Canon EOS RP is a camera in the Advanced Mirrorless class, whereas Canon EOS R is a camera in the Pro Mirrorless class.
Since both cameras share a CPU and have comparable resolutions, it’s no surprise that they both have an ISO sensitivity range of,000, which can be expanded to ISO,400. That Canon has not cut the maximum ISO of the EOS RP in order to keep it below the EOS R is a point of great satisfaction for us. Do the Canon R and Canon RP’s technical characteristics position them among the top-tier cameras in their respective classes?